Unraveling The Legacy: Who Was John Hanson?

Vincenzo Schultz 09 Jul 2025

The name "John Hanson" often conjures a curious mix of historical figures, leading to widespread confusion and fascinating misconceptions. For many, it might evoke a forgotten Founding Father, a pioneering African American statesman, or even a modern-day death row inmate. The truth is, the historical record points to distinct individuals sharing this common name, each with their own unique and significant story. This article aims to disentangle these narratives, clarify their identities, and correct the historical inaccuracies that have blurred their legacies.

Understanding the lives of these different John Hansons is not merely an academic exercise; it's crucial for appreciating the rich tapestry of American and Liberian history, recognizing the complexities of historical narratives, and discerning truth from misinformation. From the birth of a nation to the fight for justice, the name John Hanson resonates across centuries, demanding a closer look to ensure their true contributions and challenges are accurately remembered.

Here's a comprehensive guide to the various figures named John Hanson, their distinct contributions, and the common myths surrounding them:

The Founding Father: John Hanson of Maryland
The Liberian Statesman: John Hanson, an African American Pioneer
- From Slavery to Senator: A Journey to Freedom and Leadership
- Correcting the Record: Not America's First Black President
The Modern-Day Conundrum: John Fitzgerald Hanson on Death Row
- A Case of Legal Battles and Execution Stays
- The Public's Role and Ethical Debates
Why the Confusion? Disentangling the Namesake Paradox
The Importance of Historical Accuracy
Beyond the Name: Lessons from Three Lives

The Founding Father: John Hanson of Maryland

When discussing the foundational figures of the United States, the name John Hanson often emerges as a figure of quiet yet profound importance. He was an American Founding Father, a distinguished merchant, and a shrewd politician from Maryland whose contributions to the nascent nation are often overshadowed by more celebrated contemporaries. Yet, his role was instrumental in shaping the early American republic, particularly during its critical post-Revolutionary War period.

Early Life and Political Awakening

Born in Charles County, Maryland, the exact birth date of John Hanson remains a subject of ongoing historical debate, with some sources suggesting 1715 and others proposing 1721. He hailed from Mulberry Grove, a sprawling 1,000-acre tobacco plantation, a testament to his family's wealth and prominence in the region. Born into a planter family, Hanson received an education that prepared him not only for managing the vast plantation but also for a life of public service. His early career saw him appointed as county sheriff in 1750, a position that likely honed his administrative skills and deepened his understanding of local governance.

A Revolutionary Leader and Architect of a New Nation

As tensions escalated between the American colonies and Great Britain, John Hanson emerged as a staunch supporter of independence. He was not merely a passive observer but an active participant in the revolutionary movement. His commitment to the cause was evident in his involvement in various Maryland committees and conventions that laid the groundwork for the colony's break from British rule. His political acumen and dedication to the principles of liberty earned him respect among his peers, leading to his election as a delegate to the Continental Congress.

In the Continental Congress, Hanson played a crucial role in the deliberations that would define the structure of the new American government. His experience as a planter and politician, combined with his deep understanding of the colonies' needs, made him a valuable voice in the often-contentious debates. His support for independence was unwavering, and he dedicated himself to the arduous task of forging a unified nation out of disparate colonies.

President of the Confederation Congress: A Brief but Pivotal Role

One of John Hanson's most significant, yet frequently misunderstood, contributions was his service as the President of the Confederation Congress. He was elected to this esteemed position on November 5, 1781, and served a one-year term until November 4, 1782. This period was critical for the fledgling United States, as it navigated the challenges of post-war reconstruction under the Articles of Confederation. The Articles, which Hanson himself signed in 1781, represented the first constitutional framework of the United States, preceding the current U.S. Constitution.

It's vital to clarify a persistent misconception: while John Hanson was indeed a "president" under the U.S. government, he was *not* the first President of the United States as we understand the office today, established under the Constitution. His role as President of the Confederation Congress was more akin to a presiding officer or speaker of a legislative body, rather than an executive head of state with the powers later granted to George Washington. He was the third President of the United States in Congress Assembled (USCA), holding office at the Pennsylvania State House (now Independence Hall) in Philadelphia.

During his tenure, Hanson faced immense challenges. The Confederation Congress lacked strong executive power and struggled with financial instability, interstate disputes, and the enforcement of its own resolutions. Despite these limitations, Hanson's leadership was crucial in maintaining the fragile union. He oversaw the establishment of the first executive departments, the creation of the Great Seal of the United States, and the celebration of the first Thanksgiving holiday as a national event. His administrative skills helped to bring a semblance of order and continuity to a government still finding its footing.

Legacy and Historical Misinterpretations

The fact that John Hanson's legacy is often overlooked, or worse, distorted, is a curious aspect of American history. The primary reason for this oversight is that the Articles of Confederation proved to be an ineffective governing document, quickly replaced by the U.S. Constitution. Consequently, the "presidency" under the Articles faded from public memory, overshadowed by the more powerful executive office created later.

The most pervasive myth surrounding John Hanson is the claim that he was the "first black president of the United States." This assertion is entirely false and conflates the Founding Father with a different individual named John Hanson, an African American who later became a senator in Liberia. This misconception is often fueled by misinterpretations of historical roles and a lack of detailed knowledge about the transitional period of American governance. While Hanson's contributions were significant, they were within the framework of the Confederation Congress, not the executive presidency established in 1789.

To be clear, John Hanson of Maryland was a white man, a planter, and a politician from a prominent family. His role was foundational, but distinct from the modern presidency. Understanding this distinction is vital for an accurate grasp of American history.

The Liberian Statesman: John Hanson, an African American Pioneer

The name John Hanson also belongs to a remarkable African American figure whose life story is a testament to resilience, freedom, and leadership. This John Hanson, a former slave, carved out a new destiny for himself and contributed significantly to the establishment and governance of Liberia, a nation founded by freed American slaves.

From Slavery to Senator: A Journey to Freedom and Leadership

Born into slavery, this John Hanson's journey to prominence began with his emigration to Liberia in 1827. Liberia, established by the American Colonization Society, offered a new beginning for African Americans seeking freedom and self-determination away from the racial oppression prevalent in the United States. Hanson seized this opportunity, becoming part of the early waves of settlers who built the foundations of this West African nation.

His intelligence, leadership qualities, and dedication quickly became apparent. He rose through the ranks of the burgeoning Liberian society, demonstrating a commitment to public service and the development of the new nation. Following Liberia's independence in 1847, John Hanson became a prominent political figure. He served in the colonial council and later achieved the esteemed position of a senator from Grand Bassa County in 1840, a role he held after Liberia gained full sovereignty. He continued to serve his community and country until his death around 1860. A daguerreotype from 1856, attributed to Augustus Washington, offers a rare glimpse into the appearance of this distinguished Liberian statesman.

Correcting the Record: Not America's First Black President

Despite his undeniable significance in Liberian history, this John Hanson has unfortunately become the subject of a pervasive historical inaccuracy in the United States: the claim that he was the "first black president of the United States." This assertion, often propagated through various online channels, including a story from Liberty Writers Africa, which cited photos of a purported African American on the back of currency (a claim easily debunked as no such image exists on US currency), is demonstrably false.

It is crucial to reiterate that the Liberian Senator John Hanson is a completely different individual from the Founding Father John Hanson of Maryland. They lived in different centuries for a significant portion of their lives, in different continents, and held vastly different political offices. The Liberian John Hanson was never a president of the United States in any capacity, nor did he live in the United States during the period of its early presidency. This misconception often arises from a superficial understanding of history, conflating names and roles without proper contextualization.

The historical record is clear: the first President of the United States was George Washington. The first African American President of the United States was Barack Obama. While the Liberian John Hanson's story is incredibly inspiring and important, it must be understood within its proper historical and geographical context.

The Modern-Day Conundrum: John Fitzgerald Hanson on Death Row

In a stark contrast to the historical figures, the name John Hanson has recently resurfaced in contemporary news, associated with a high-profile legal case in the United States. This modern-day individual, John Fitzgerald Hanson, is a death row inmate in Oklahoma, whose legal battles have drawn national attention and sparked intense debates about capital punishment and the justice system.

A Case of Legal Battles and Execution Stays

John Fitzgerald Hanson was sentenced to death for a horrific 1999 murder, involving carjacking and kidnapping. He had also been serving a life sentence, plus 82 years, at the U.S. Penitentiary in Pollock, Louisiana, for federal crimes related to a robbery spree. His case gained significant media traction when Oklahoma scheduled his execution for December 15, 2022. However, the Biden administration blocked his transfer from federal custody to the state, temporarily halting the execution.

The legal saga continued. Oklahoma's Attorney General, Gentner Drummond, actively sought Hanson's transfer, particularly after the Trump administration, on its first day back in office, issued a sweeping executive order restoring the death penalty. This move expedited the transfer of inmates like Hanson to state custody for execution. Indeed, the Associated Press reported that Oklahoma executed a man whose transfer was expedited by the Trump administration, although it's important to note that the specific individual's name isn't always immediately tied to these broader policy statements.

Hanson's execution has been a subject of intense legal wrangling. An Oklahoma County judge temporarily paused his execution just days before he was scheduled to die by lethal injection. This stay was granted pending the resolution of his lawsuit against the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board. Hanson's lawsuit claimed that his clemency hearing was unfair, specifically citing that the newest board member, Sean Malloy, had been a prosecutor in Tulsa County at the time of his resentencing trial, raising concerns about potential bias.

Despite these legal challenges, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals denied a petition claiming the state withheld evidence during his trial, allowing his execution to proceed as scheduled on a Thursday. This case underscores the complex and often contentious nature of death penalty litigation, where every procedural detail and every claim of bias or withheld evidence can lead to a stay or a final decision.

The Public's Role and Ethical Debates

The case of John Fitzgerald Hanson has not only played out in courtrooms but also in the public sphere. Various groups have actively protested his execution, with plans for demonstrations outside the governor's mansion in Oklahoma City. These protests reflect broader societal debates about capital punishment, the fairness of the justice system, and the ethical implications of state-sanctioned executions.

The public's engagement, whether through protests or legal advocacy, highlights the profound impact such cases have on communities and the ongoing struggle for what is perceived as justice. The name John Hanson, in this context, becomes a symbol not of historical governance or pioneering freedom, but of the deeply personal and often agonizing realities of the modern criminal justice system.

Why the Confusion? Disentangling the Namesake Paradox

The persistent confusion surrounding the various individuals named John Hanson is a fascinating case study in how historical information can become distorted. Several factors contribute to this "namesake paradox":

Commonality of Names: "John Hanson" is not an uncommon name, especially in historical contexts. Just as there are multiple "John Smiths," it's statistically probable that several individuals of note would share the same name across different eras and geographies.
Lack of Widespread Historical Knowledge: The intricacies of early American governance under the Articles of Confederation are not widely taught or understood by the general public. This knowledge gap allows for the misattribution of roles and titles. Similarly, the history of Liberian independence and its early leaders is not a common subject in American education.
The Internet and Misinformation: The digital age, while providing unprecedented access to information, also facilitates the rapid spread of unverified claims. A single sensational headline or social media post can quickly go viral, cementing false narratives in public consciousness. The claim about a "black first president" named John Hanson is a prime example of this.
Desire for "Hidden Histories": There's a natural human inclination to uncover "lost" or "suppressed" histories, especially those that challenge conventional narratives or offer empowering perspectives (e.g., a black first president). While this desire can lead to valuable historical research, it can also make individuals more susceptible to believing sensational but unfounded claims.
Superficial Research: Many people encounter a name like "John Hanson" and, upon finding a snippet of information (e.g., "President of Congress"), jump to conclusions without delving into the full context or verifying the identity of the specific individual.

Disentangling these narratives requires a commitment to critical thinking, a willingness to consult multiple reliable sources, and an understanding that not all information found online is accurate. It underscores the importance of distinguishing between historical fact and popular myth.

The Importance of Historical Accuracy

In an age saturated with information, the emphasis on historical accuracy has never been more critical. The case of John Hanson perfectly illustrates why adhering to principles like E-E-A-T (Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) and understanding the implications of YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) content is paramount, even in historical narratives.

Expertise: To accurately present the lives of the various John Hansons, one must possess expertise in early American history, African American history, Liberian history, and the intricacies of the U.S. legal system. Without this depth of knowledge, it's easy to conflate identities and propagate errors.

Authoritativeness: An authoritative account relies on verified facts, primary sources where possible, and consensus among reputable historians. When addressing the "first black president" myth, for instance, an authoritative stance directly refutes the claim with clear, evidence-based reasoning, rather than simply presenting it as a debate.

Trustworthiness: Trustworthiness is built on transparency and integrity. Acknowledging the existence of multiple individuals with the same name, clearly delineating their stories, and directly correcting misinformation builds trust with the reader. It demonstrates a commitment to truth over sensationalism.

While historical articles might not immediately seem like "Your Money or Your Life" content, the broader implications of historical accuracy can indeed affect public well-being. Misinformation about historical figures, especially those tied to national identity or racial narratives, can:

Skew Public Understanding: False historical claims can distort public perception of a nation's past, leading to a flawed understanding of its present challenges and future direction.
Undermine Education: When popular myths overshadow factual history, it makes the job of educators more difficult and can lead to a less informed citizenry.
Impact Social Justice Narratives: Fabricated histories, even if well-intentioned, can detract from genuine struggles and achievements, potentially trivializing real historical injustices or triumphs. The story of the Liberian John Hanson is powerful enough without needing to falsely elevate him to a role he never held.
Influence Legal and Ethical Debates: In the case of John Fitzgerald Hanson, accurate reporting of legal proceedings and the complexities of the death penalty case directly impacts public discourse on justice, ethics, and human rights. Misinformation here could have tangible consequences for public opinion and policy.

Therefore, presenting accurate, well-researched, and clearly articulated historical information is a vital service to the public, contributing to a more informed and discerning society.

Beyond the Name: Lessons from Three Lives

The stories of the various individuals named John Hanson offer more than just a lesson in historical disambiguation; they provide profound insights into different facets of human experience and historical development:

The Founding Father: John Hanson of Maryland reminds us that nation-building is a complex, often understated process involving many dedicated individuals whose contributions, though vital, may not always be celebrated in popular memory. His tenure as President of the Confederation Congress highlights the experimental and often turbulent nature of early American governance, a period of trial and error that ultimately led to a stronger union. His legacy underscores the importance of recognizing the full breadth of those who laid the groundwork for the United States, beyond the most famous names.
The Liberian Statesman: The Liberian John Hanson's journey from slavery to statesmanship is a powerful narrative of resilience, self-determination, and the pursuit of freedom. His life embodies the hopes and struggles of African Americans who sought to build a new society free from oppression. His story is a significant chapter in both American and African history, illustrating the global impact of the transatlantic slave trade and the enduring human spirit to forge new destinies.
The Modern-Day Inmate: John Fitzgerald Hanson's case brings to the forefront the enduring complexities and ethical dilemmas of the modern justice system, particularly concerning capital punishment. It forces a critical examination of legal processes, the role of administrative powers, and the profound human impact of judicial decisions. His story, though tragic, serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing debates about crime, punishment, and the pursuit of justice in contemporary society.

In conclusion, the name John Hanson is a fascinating historical anomaly, a shared identity that bridges distinct eras, continents, and human experiences. By carefully distinguishing between the Founding Father, the Liberian Senator, and the modern-day death row inmate, we not only correct historical inaccuracies but also gain a richer, more nuanced understanding of the diverse tapestry of human history. Each John Hanson, in his own right, left a unique mark, and it is our responsibility to ensure their stories are told with clarity, accuracy, and the respect they deserve.

We hope this comprehensive look at the various John Hansons has clarified any confusion and provided valuable insight. Do you have more questions about these historical figures, or perhaps other historical figures whose names cause similar confusion? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and consider exploring more of our articles to deepen your understanding of history and its fascinating complexities.

Equals Sign

Equal Sign | Equal to Sign | Equality Sign | Symbol, Meanings

Equal Symbol

Breathe Better